Rivacor 7 VR-T / DR-T / VR-T DX
改善治疗并降低风险长达 15 年1
对于心律失常患者来说,ICD 治疗可以成为一项重要的保障措施,它对于最大限度地降低风险并提高长期生活质量至关重要。这就是使用寿命长达 15 年1、全新、更小巧、更简单的 Rivacor 7 ICD 系统的设计目的——在重要的时机和部位优化治疗。 在与 Home Monitoring® 技术一起使用时,可以更早2检测出 AF,同时减少不恰当的放电并降低住院率3。这已经得到临床验证。
产品亮点
BIOshape 超薄 10 mm ICD
Rivacor ICD 小巧纤薄——从正面到背面仅 10 mm——具有光滑、椭圆形且适合身体的 BIOshape4
15 年使用寿命 10 年担保
Rivacor ICD 的电池寿命长达 15 年1,并提供 10 年全面担保
DX 技术
所有这些优势还可以通过独特的 DX 技术实现,该技术可通过单导线提供完整的心房诊断功能
下载 & 相关链接
联系我们
参考文献
1. 单腔 ICD,标准条件,Rivacor 7 VR-T、RV:2.5 V/0.4 ms,40 bpm,500 Ω;RV:15% 起搏;最多 2 次能量电击/年;家庭监测:打开(每日传输);诊断:打开。存档数据(服务时间计算);2. Varma N et al. Efficacy and Safety of Automatic Remote Monitoring for Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Follow-Up: The Lumos-T Safely Reduces Routine Office Device Follow-Up (TRUST) Trial. Circulation, 2010;122: 325 – 332.; 3. Guedon-Moreau L et al. Decreased delivery of inappropriate shocks achieved by remote monitoring of ICD: a substudy of the ECOST trial. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 25 (2014), 763-770.; 4. Contoured housing; Acticor/Rivacor VR: 60x61.5x10 mm; 30 ccm.; 5. As part of an MR conditional system.; 6. Post-Market observation; Final report, March, 2019. 存档数据;7.设备形状分析,2019 年 2 月。存档数据;8.上市后观察;中期分析,2018 年 12 月 21 日。存档数据;9. Acticor/Rivacor Single-chamber ICD @ 60 ppm, 15% pacing, 2.5V, 500 Ohms: Medtronic 3T Full-body MRI; VISIA AF (EVERA; MIRRO) MRI S VR SureScan: 10.7 years (MDT IFU) vs Acticor 7 VR-T ProMRI: 14.9 years. Competitor device manuals as of Nov. 2018.; 10. Polyzos KA, Konstantelias AA, Falagas ME, Risk factors for cardiac implantable electronic device infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis, Europace (2015) 17, 767-777.; 11. In patients without a history of atrial arrhythmias at implant.; 12. Biffi M, Iori M, De Maria E, et al. The role of atrial sensing for new-onset atrial arrhythmias diagnosis and management in single-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients: Results from the THINGS registry. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, Volume 31, Issue 4, April 2020, Pages 846–853.; 13. Pung X, Hong DZ, Ho TY, et al. The utilization of atrial sensing dipole in single lead implantable cardioverter defibrillator for detection of new-onset atrial high-rate episodes or subclinical atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Arrhythmia. Volume 38, Issue 2, 15 January 2022, Pages 177–186.; 14. Thomas G, Choi DY, Doppalapudi H, et al. Subclinical atrial fibrillation detection with a floating atrial sensing dipole in single lead implantable cardioverter-defibrillator systems: Results of the SENSE trial. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, Volume 30, Issue 10, October 2019, Pages 1994–2001.; 15. Hindricks G, Theuns DA, Bar-Lev D, et al. Ability to remotely monitor atrial high-rate episodes using a single-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator with a floating atrial sensing dipole, EP Europace, Volume 25, Issue 5, May 2023, Pages 1-10, euad061.; 16. Fact file: Cardiac Imaging with MRI, CT and Nuclear Techniques British Heart Foundation. January 2010.; 17. When patients are monitored by BIOTRONIK Home Monitoring. See ProMRI manual for all details.; 18. Schwab JO et al. Clinical Course of Dual-Chamber Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Recipients followed by Cardiac Remote Monitoring: Insights from the LION Registry. BioMed Research International, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3120480.; 19. Ricci R P et al. Long-term patient acceptance of and satisfaction with implanted device remote monitoring. Europace (2010) 12, 674-679.; 20. Hindricks G et al. Implant-based multiparameter telemonitoring of patients with heart failure (IN-TIME): a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2014; 384 (9943): 583–590.; 21. Crossley G H et al. The CONNEXT (Clinical Evaluation of Remote Notification to Reduce Time to Clinical Decision) Trial. JACC. 2011; 57(10):1181-1189 [for bar chart comparison only].