Rivacor 3 HF-T QP/HF-T
Simplified and optimized CRT for up to 9 years1
Heart failure is tough to live with and can be complex and time-consuming to treat and manage. It’s these real life challenges that Rivacor 3 CRT-D systems are engineered to deal with. These new and smaller systems simplify treatment and therapy for up to 9 years1, and when used with BIOTRONIK Home Monitoring technology, they have been clinically proven to help prolong life further30.
Product Highlights
BIOshape. Ultraslim 10 mm ICD.
Rivacor CRT-Ds are small and slim — only 10 mm from front to back — with a smooth, elliptical, and body-friendly BIOshape1.
9 Years Longevity. 6 Years Warranty.
Rivacor CRT-Ds have an extended battery life of 9 years9, supported by a full 6-year warranty.
Full 3T MRI. Autodetected.
All Rivacor devices feature ProMRI, which gives full and uncompromised access to high-resolution MRI, with full-body scanning and no exclusion zone.
Downloads and Related Links
Contact Us
References
1st Contoured housing; Acticor/Rivacor CRT-D QP: 60 x 75 x 10 mm; 35 ccm; CRT-D: 60 x 71.5 x 10 mm; 33 ccm
2 as part of an MR Conditional system
3 Post-Market observation; interim analysis, December 21, 2018. Data on file.
4 Device shape analysis, February 2019. Data on file.
5 Post-market observation; interim analysis, December 21, 2018. Data on file.
6 Post-market observation; interim analysis, December 21, 2018. Data on file.
7 Device shape analysis, February 2019. Data on file.
8 Post-market observation; interim analysis, December 21, 2018. Data on file.
9 Acticor/Rivacor HF-T QP, 9.3 years @ 60 ppm; RA 15%, RV/LV 100% pacing, RA/RV/LV @ 2.5 V/0.4 ms; 500 ohms,
2 max. energy shocks/year. Data on file.
10 Acticor/Rivacor HF-T QP: 9.3 years @ 60 ppm; RA 15%, RV/LV 100% pacing, RA/RV/LV @ 2.5 V/0.4 ms; 500 ohms,
2 max. energy shocks/year: Data on file vs. Medtronic 3T FBS; CLARIA (AMPLIA, COMPIA) MRI QUAD CRT-D SureScan:
6.8 years; Competitor device manuals as of Nov. 2018
11 Lee DS et al. Evaluation of Early Complications Related to De Novo Cardioverter Defibrillator Implantation.
Insights From The Ontario ICD database. J Am Col Cardiol 2010; 55:774-82
12 Fact file: Cardiac Imaging with MRI, CT and Nuclear Techniques, British Heart Foundation. January 2010.
13 When patients are monitored by BIOTRONIK Home Monitoring. See ProMRI® manual for all details.
14 Hindricks G et al. Implant-based multiparameter telemonitoring of patients with heart failure (IN-TIME):
a randomized controlled trial. The Lancet. 2014; 384 (9943): 583-590
15 Varma N et al. Efficacy and Safety of Automatic Remote Monitoring for Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Follow-Up:
The Lumos-T Safely Reduces Routine Office Device Follow-Up (TRUST) Trial. Circulation, 2010; 122: 325–332.
16 Hindricks G et al. Implant-based multiparameter telemonitoring of patients with heart failure (IN-TIME):
a randomized controlled trial. The Lancet. 2014; 384 (9943): 583–590; (3.4% in the Home Monitoring Group vs. 8.7%
in the control group)
17 Ricci R P et al. Long-term patient acceptance of and satisfaction with implanted device remote monitoring.
Europace (2010) 12, 674-679.
18 Ricci R P et al. Long-term patient acceptance of and satisfaction with implanted device remote monitoring.
Europace (2010) 12, 674-679.
19 Hindricks G et al. Implant-based multiparameter telemonitoring of patients with heart failure (IN-TIME):
a randomized controlled trial. The Lancet. 2014; 384 (9943): 583-590
20 Vs. 55% - Crossley G H, Boyle A, Vitense H, et al. The CONNEXT (Clinical Evaluation of Remote
Notification to Reduce Time to Clinical Decision) Trial. JACC. 2011; 57(10):1181-1189 [for bar chart comparison only]
21 Ricci R P et al. Long-term patient acceptance of and satisfaction with implanted device remote monitoring.
Europace (2010) 12, 674-679.
22 Performance analysis. Data on file, 2018
23 Performance analysis. Data on file, 2018
24 Martin DO et al. Heart Rhythm 2012;9(11):1807-1814
25 van Gelder BM, Bracke FA, Meijer A, Pijls NH. The hemodynamic effect of intrinsic conduction during left
ventricular pacing as compared to biventricular pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:2305–2310.
26 Acticor/Rivacor HF-T QP, 10.8 years @ 60 ppm; RA 15%, RV 0%, LV 100% pacing, RA/RV/LV @ 2.5 V/0.4 ms;
500 Ohms, 2 max. energy shocks/year. Data on file.
27 Post-market observation; interim analysis, December 21, 2018. Data on file.
28 QP models only
29 Post-Market observation; interim analysis, December 21, 2018. Data on file.
30 Hindricks G et al. Implant-based multiparameter telemonitoring of patients with heart failure (IN-TIME):
a randomized controlled trial. The Lancet. 2014; 384 (9943): 583–590; (3.4% in the Home Monitoring Group vs.
8.7% in the control group).